$2,750,000
- 5 bd
- 3 ba
- 3,131 sq ft
5092 E Equestrian Orange, CA 92869
Listed by: Erika Arellano, DRE #02105108 from eXp Realty of Southern Ca, Inc

Equestrian property across Orange County, community by community — what the zoning allows, where the trails go, and who actually buys there.
Fourteen jurisdictions, fourteen different answers. A one-acre lot might permit four horses, six, eight, ten, fifteen — or none at all, depending entirely on which side of a city line it sits.
Three OC communities have no numeric limit whatsoever, and one has no public horse law at all. Neither of those means what people assume.
Nobody publishes this, so far as we can find. Every figure is read from the adopted code or specific plan, and each links through to the page where it is cited and dated.
| Jurisdiction | Minimum lot | How many |
|---|---|---|
| Yorba Linda | 15,000 sq ft by right | 1 at 10,000 → 6 at an acre, +2 per acre |
| Orange Park Acres — county side | none stated | 1 per 5,000 sq ft (1 per 3,500 with a permit) |
| Orange Park Acres — city side | 20,000 sq ft and R1-20 zoning | 2, +1 per 10,000 sq ft, hard cap 6 |
| Anaheim Hills | 1 acre — or 22,000 sq ft in RH-2 | 1 per quarter-acre |
| Villa Park | 10,000 sq ft | 2 → 6 above 45,000 sq ft |
| San Juan Capistrano | by district (RA 2.5 acres) | 1 per 10,000 sq ft; permit bands at 4 / 6 / 10 |
| Trabuco Canyon | 20,000 sq ft | 4 → 15 at two acres |
| Fullerton | ¾ acre net, R-1 only | 2, +1 per 15,000 sq ft, cap 5 without a permit |
| Laguna Hills | 15,000 sq ft | 2 animal units → 10 maximum |
| Newport Beach — Santa Ana Heights | under 10,000 sq ft permitted | 1 → 2 at 10,000, 3–6 with a permit |
| Brea — Olinda Village only | 1 acre | 4, +1 per 15,000 sq ft |
| Silverado / Modjeska | — | no numeric limit |
| North Tustin — Lemon & Cowan Heights | — | no numeric limit |
| Coto de Caza | — | no public law at all |
Scroll the table sideways to see all three columns.
Read that table before you fall in love with a listing. A two-acre parcel in Trabuco Canyon and a two-acre parcel in Anaheim Hills are, on paper, fifteen horses and eight horses respectively — and in Coto de Caza the same two acres has no published answer.
Because there is no single regulator. Some of this land is in a city, some is unincorporated county, and some communities are split down the middle. Three things follow that catch people out.
Orange County's Zoning Code contains an “E” Equine Combining District (Sec. 7-9-41) with the generous rule everyone quotes: one horse per 5,000 square feet, or one per 3,500 with a Recreational Equine Use Permit.
It applies only where the district symbol carries a parenthetical (E). There are six such polygons in the entire county, about 393 acres between them, and 99.7% of that acreage is in Orange Park Acres.
So the county's headline horse rule does not reach Coto de Caza, Trabuco Canyon, Silverado, Modjeska or North Tustin. Anyone quoting one-per-5,000 to you about a property outside OPA is quoting a rule that does not apply to it.

Three OC communities have no numeric horse cap: Silverado and Modjeska Canyon, and North Tustin's Lemon Heights and Cowan Heights. In each case the reason is the same — the (E) district carrying the numbers is not mapped there, and the base zoning simply does not state a figure.
What still governs is real: a 25-foot separation from any residential window on an adjoining building site, base-district setbacks, a prohibition on keeping animals commercially without a permit, and the County Health Officer's authority. In the canyons, fire hazard classification does more to constrain a property than any animal rule.
And in North Tustin there is a genuine definitional question — the permission runs through a section about “domestic pets and animals,” while the code defines “equine” separately. Get a written determination from OC Development Services rather than relying on the absence of a number.
Coto de Caza is the clearest case. Orange County's most horse-identified community has no public horse-count law whatsoever — its Specific Plan is silent, and the fall-through provision caps dogs and cats then delegates everything else. What governs your horses there is the recorded CC&Rs, which are private and not published.
The mirror image is Fullerton, which has a more precise ordinance than the county's and almost no land to apply it to — roughly 2% of its R-1 parcels reach the three-quarter-acre net threshold.
Concentration matters more than county-wide totals. In practice Orange County horse property clusters in a handful of places:
Verified September 10, 2026. Each figure above is drawn from the research behind the individual city page, where it is quoted, cited to section and dated. Where a community has no page yet — Laguna Hills, Newport Beach, Brea and North Tustin — the figures come from the adopted code or specific plan, checked the same way.
Confirm any specific parcel with the city or county that has jurisdiction over it. In Orange County that is genuinely the first question, not a formality: several communities here are split between two regulators, and in Orange Park Acres you cannot tell which one applies from the street name. This page is written by a real estate broker, not by any city or the County.
Establishes the regulator before anything else, because in this county that single fact changes the answer to every other question. Then reads the actual parcel against the actual rule — not the county rule, not the reputation of the neighbourhood, and not what the listing says.
She has closed horse property in Yorba Linda, Orange Park Acres, Silverado and Fullerton, on both sides of the Orange Park Acres line. If a property does not work for the horses you own, she will say so before you write the offer.
Zoning, setbacks and what it means →
Zoning, setbacks and what it means →
Zoning, setbacks and what it means →
Zoning, setbacks and what it means →
Zoning, setbacks and what it means →
Zoning, setbacks and what it means →
Zoning, setbacks and what it means →
Zoning, setbacks and what it means →
Zoning, setbacks and what it means →
These areas do not have a written guide yet — ask Sharon directly and she will tell you what the rules are there.
$2,750,000
Listed by: Erika Arellano, DRE #02105108 from eXp Realty of Southern Ca, Inc
$5,999,000
Listed by: Flo Bullock, DRE #01343119 from Bullock Russell RE Services
$775,000
Listed by: ElaineJohnson Armogida, DRE #01069906 from Circa Properties, Inc.
$659,000
Listed by: Stephen Almond, DRE #01919378 from Berkshire Hathaway Home Services
$3,068,000
Listed by: Andrea Burrows, DRE #01356591 from Yorba Canyon Realty
$3,180,000
Listed by: Christine Li, DRE #02003306 from Real Broker
$1,100,000
Listed by: Jing Li, DRE #02109608 from Real Broker
$3,250,000
Listed by: Peter Au, DRE #01935667 from Pacific Sotheby's International Realty
$729,000
Listed by: Denise Xiao, DRE #02028102 from Elevate Real Estate Agency
$2,499,000
Listed by: Christine Kim, DRE #01032705 from RE/MAX GALAXY
$758,888
Listed by: Andy Yao, DRE #01984906 from Andy Yao Brokerage
$749,000
Listed by: SusanHirzel, DRE #01904282 from Circa Properties, Inc.
Drawn from the 6 cities in Orange County where we have a sourced horse-keeping lot minimum (Yorba Linda, Anaheim Hills, Coto De Caza, Fullerton, Orange Park Acres, Trabuco Canyon). Each city page explains its own rule.
Quoted verbatim and shortened only at sentence breaks — and dated honestly, because some of these go back a long way.
Reviews left on Sharon’s Zillow profile.
Yorba Linda · Orange Park Acres · Norco
Sharon sells in these three markets. When something comes up, she will send it — with what the lot actually allows.